Comments on: Gary Smith EDA’s impressions on ARM Techcon 2012 https://armdevices.net/2012/11/02/gary-smith-edas-impressions-on-arm-techcon-2012/ New video posted every 8 hours, forever Mon, 06 May 2013 21:59:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Gary Smith EDA » ARMdevices.net-11/12 https://armdevices.net/2012/11/02/gary-smith-edas-impressions-on-arm-techcon-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-15045 Mon, 06 May 2013 21:59:05 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=81171#comment-15045 […] Blog: Gary Smith EDA’s impressions on ARM Techcon 2012 […]

]]>
By: Maventwo https://armdevices.net/2012/11/02/gary-smith-edas-impressions-on-arm-techcon-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-14159 Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:20:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=81171#comment-14159 One thing that Gary Smith didn´t mention was the development towards 2,5D and 3D with much more integration of SoC and RAM-memory and other solid memories like ReRAM (Memristor is a kind of ReRAM) which is coming forthcoming years.

2,5D and 3D will make ARM and now Imaging Technologies acquisition of MIPS
much more competitive to Intel than no develompment towards 2,5D and 3D.

]]>
By: Maventwo https://armdevices.net/2012/11/02/gary-smith-edas-impressions-on-arm-techcon-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-14148 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:25:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=81171#comment-14148 Innteresting to hear Gary Smith´s views on Techcon and his life experience and know-how about past and his predictions of future for x86 vs ARM heterogenous architecture.

Think of Intel Fellow Mark Bohr´s former discrediting of the Foundry model
vs Gary Smith´s words of ARM community of many developers and makers in this interview.

It is easy to understand that Intels model of owning it´s own Fabs vs the Foundry model,

that the Foundry model will win because of the cost of owning it´s own Fabs.

]]>
By: Iso9660 https://armdevices.net/2012/11/02/gary-smith-edas-impressions-on-arm-techcon-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-14129 Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:35:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=81171#comment-14129 Please, next time don’t move the camera.

]]>