Comments on: Legalizing piracy and enabling better content creation through a Global Licence https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/ New video posted every 8 hours, forever Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:32:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Mp3.com copies of Cloud music storage services from Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple – ARMdevices.net https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-8629 Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:01:38 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-8629 […] 5. The cloud service providers, perhaps with help from the Government, need to implement global content subscription plans, around $10 per month should give unlimited legal access to all Music, Movies, TV Shows, Ebooks and Applications. If everyone in Europe and the USA paid $10 per month, that would amount to $60 Billion per year, plenty enough to pay for all the content creators directly, no DRM needed, no separate subscription plans needed, one plan should provide legal access to everything, and piracy can get legalized. […]

]]>
By: Charbax https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-8052 Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:37:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-8052 In reply to Ravyne.

I think my proposition actually empowers the small independent content creators and takes away control and stealing abilities from the big content intermediaries, as the money will go directly to the content creators, directly to the artists, and the algorithms can be so that a per view basis, larger productions make less per view compared to smaller productions, also taking into account imprecisions in the overall statistical system. But obviously, if you make a production which only half a dozen people watch or listen to, you will get a lot less money than a content creator who manages to reach many thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of viewers or listeners that also give the content a high rating meaning they especially enjoy it and don’t skip through it or get to it through some kind of click fraud.

]]>
By: Ravyne https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-8050 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:33:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-8050 The issue I have, is where does this leave very-small content producers, for example independent game studios who make not even enough money to constitute a full-time job for their team members? With such limited popularity (relatively speaking, in comparison with “big media”) how do we avoid that their comparatively infinitesimal “rank” within this scheme doesn’t simply fall through the cracks so that they get their cut — how do we ensure that their interests are protected, even though they have to resources to do so themselves? If this scheme came to pass, small content producers will no longer be able to charge directly, as the expectation will have been set that “everything is free.” Their only means of direct funding will become to simply ask for donations.

How do we prevent those with the means and resources to game the system from gaming the system?

Both Hollywood and the music industry outright steal from even their top talents through creative accounting practices, shell companies and the like… If NewLine Cinema can steal 100 million form Peter Jackson, they’re not going to bat even a single eyelash at effectively stealing similar or larger sums from 10s of thousands of faceless “little guys” through whatever means they can muster.

]]>
By: Google TV seeks FCC regulation to start a WebTV revolution – ARMdevices.net https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7927 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:15:09 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7927 […] Government regulation, that is to standardize the all-you-can-eat subscription model so that one Global Licence cover the legal and free access to all […]

]]>
By: Charbax https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7905 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:06:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7905 In reply to attila_toth.

Yup it can be taxed at ISP level, or it could be part of taxes that everyone pays. Just as taxes pay for schools, libraries and often also subsidizes artists, film productions, theatre plays and music festivals already. So it would thus be expanded.

]]>
By: attila_toth https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7903 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:01:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7903 In reply to Charbax.

Practically the clearing house, as I use it here, is the institution you referred. It should be independent and owned by its own partners, content owners, distributors, ISPs, telcos, etc. My main point that you, the user, don’t pay directly for the content and separately for the access, but you pay for the ISP/telco one fee that covers not just the access in the technical terms, but all the content you use. Then the content money goes to clearing houses which distribute the money upon consumption statistics as you wrote.
It seems to me the simplest business model.

]]>
By: Charbax https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7902 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:40:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7902 In reply to attila_toth.

I don’t know for sure what the definition is for that clearing house that you are talking about. I think that the redistribution of tax collected money has to be taken care of by an institution which purpose would be to coordinate a transparent and verifiable system of ratings and statistics for the consumption rate and appreciation of all web contents.

The way I see it, there should be some new content scrobbler multimedia player plugins similar to the Last.fm scrobbler, which users can voluntarily install on their computer or mobile computers and smartphones, that scrobbler would report the exact playback seconds on each multimedia file, and databases over all files and content ID can then generate very representative statistics over ratings and popularity of all the content. I believe these kinds of statistics can be much more precise allowing for much longer tail than the ones current TV and radio rely upon to measure audience.

This redistribution institution would establish and encourage thus more transparent ratings and statistics, they would collect stats directly from all the major reliable players in the industry such as Google, Microsoft and others would provide each their independent stats and that institution could compare stats to compile the global value.

Basic thing is for this to happen, there probably needs to be law and regulation that needs to happen first. Google and others such as Netflix, Microsoft etc may try to run each their own private subscription models, they may even think very inovatively and try to create an industry wide coalition to provide interoperability on their private subscription plans, but as long as those depend on rights holders, I don’t think we can expect any meaningful result.

]]>
By: Julien LEFORT https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7901 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:21:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7901 I can only agree with you on the global licensing.
But as you say “The money can be distributed directly to content creators, skipping all intermediaries”, this is why this type of licensing is not existing yet, majors do not want to get wiped out by this license and loose their (still large?) profits.
They have to be involved at some point in the global licensing, otherwise, their lobbying will prevent this new business model to happen.

People also need a global (geographically) license. Content has to be shared world wide. This is mainly true for tv series. In France for example, you often have a season gap between the US and France. This is the “now Generation” and people don’t want to wait for a year to have the new episodes. That’s why streaming solutions (megavideo, …), or VPN solutions (to get a US IP address) are so successful right now. These solutions make no sense, it is high time governments move their butts and take their responsibilities instead of running after “pirates”…

]]>
By: attila_toth https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7894 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 07:57:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7894 Involving governments in the collection and distribution of the money means involving political issues, corruption and waste of public money. It would be better to create clearing houses for this purpose which are responsible for distributing all the contents and fees.
Unfortunately this will not happen soon, as it would deeply hurt big companies already in the online content distribution business, like Apple.

]]>
By: Charbax https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7889 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 07:21:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7889 In reply to Bob.

Content creators and all their crews get paid salaries out of this $60 Billion in revenues. How big is the current music + movies + tv revenues today really? Profits of the intermediaries would also be removed from this proposition. Only content creators and their crews should profit, and that profit mostly means they get paid good salaries based on their talents and they get to spend more and more money on future productions based on their previous productions ratings and popularity.

And my $5 per month per person may be a low initial number put there just to make a point. I think the tax may be an average, set based on how much content needs to be created, based on algorithms that measure how many content creators make content that users enjoy to watch. So as it may start at $5/month/person, it could increase over time as more and more content will be made.

]]>
By: Charbax https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7890 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 07:21:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7890 In reply to Bob.

Content creators and all their crews get paid salaries out of this $60 Billion in revenues. How big is the current music + movies + tv revenues today really? Profits of the intermediaries would also be removed from this proposition. Only content creators and their crews should profit, and that profit mostly means they get paid good salaries based on their talents and they get to spend more and more money on future productions based on their previous productions ratings and popularity.

And my $5 per month per person may be a low initial number put there just to make a point. I think the tax may be an average, set based on how much content needs to be created, based on algorithms that measure how many content creators make content that users enjoy to watch. So as it may start at $5/month/person, it could increase over time as more and more content will be made.

]]>
By: Bob https://armdevices.net/2011/02/08/legalizing-piracy-and-enabling-better-content-creation/comment-page-1/#comment-7887 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 07:14:00 +0000 http://138.2.152.197/?p=4506#comment-7887 $60 billion in revenues means maybe $5-10 billion in profits. Not enough. Maybe for music where production costs are much lower but not for music + movies + TV.

]]>