<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Galaxy S WiFi 5.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armdevices.net/2011/02/14/samsung-galaxy-s-wifi-5-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armdevices.net/2011/02/14/samsung-galaxy-s-wifi-5-0/</link>
	<description>Blog on ARM Powered® devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:41:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Gutscheincode</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2011/02/14/samsung-galaxy-s-wifi-5-0/comment-page-1/#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator>Gutscheincode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=4686#comment-9200</guid>
		<description>They look awesome, let&#039;s hope they price it well, though I can&#039;t help but wish that they were based upon the Galaxy S II instead of the first version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look awesome, let&#8217;s hope they price it well, though I can&#8217;t help but wish that they were based upon the Galaxy S II instead of the first version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrenbzf</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2011/02/14/samsung-galaxy-s-wifi-5-0/comment-page-1/#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrenbzf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=4686#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>For me it needs HDMI, although the A8 processor on this would only do 720p w/o dual display.  This should fit in my Kuhl pants cell phone pocket.  Wanna give a quick shout out to them: https://www.kuhl.com/categories/Mens/Pants/  

I&#039;m also really interested in finding out how Honeycomb works on a 5&quot; device, and also on the new 1280x768 4.5&quot; Hitachi LCD&#039;s.  If I held that close enough to my face, it will be the same as looking at a 7&quot; screen from a slightly further difference.  I would really like to know if the buttons on the apps will be big enough to accurately press though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it needs HDMI, although the A8 processor on this would only do 720p w/o dual display.  This should fit in my Kuhl pants cell phone pocket.  Wanna give a quick shout out to them: <a href="https://www.kuhl.com/categories/Mens/Pants/" rel="nofollow">https://www.kuhl.com/categories/Mens/Pants/</a>  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also really interested in finding out how Honeycomb works on a 5&#8243; device, and also on the new 1280&#215;768 4.5&#8243; Hitachi LCD&#8217;s.  If I held that close enough to my face, it will be the same as looking at a 7&#8243; screen from a slightly further difference.  I would really like to know if the buttons on the apps will be big enough to accurately press though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gilboy</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2011/02/14/samsung-galaxy-s-wifi-5-0/comment-page-1/#comment-8000</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gilboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=4686#comment-8000</guid>
		<description>This device looks very snappy. My guess is that the 4.0 device will be available for $200-250 and the 5.0 for $100 more. I think Samsung knows that charging anything over $350 would not be very logical, especially when there are other affordable choices out there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This device looks very snappy. My guess is that the 4.0 device will be available for $200-250 and the 5.0 for $100 more. I think Samsung knows that charging anything over $350 would not be very logical, especially when there are other affordable choices out there. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

