<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ARM Powered Google TV, how soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/</link>
	<description>Blog on ARM Powered® devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: ARM Powered Google TV now confirmed officially by Google &#8211; ARMdevices.net</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9443</link>
		<dc:creator>ARM Powered Google TV now confirmed officially by Google &#8211; ARMdevices.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 23:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-9443</guid>
		<description>[...] the tip from me from an anonymous source here since January (I have been speculating about it (2) (3) (4) for over a year), clues about it from ARM President Tudor Brown last year in November, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the tip from me from an anonymous source here since January (I have been speculating about it (2) (3) (4) for over a year), clues about it from ARM President Tudor Brown last year in November, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARM Powered Google TV confirmed &#8211; ARMdevices.net</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>ARM Powered Google TV confirmed &#8211; ARMdevices.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>[...] have been rumoring this for many months here on ARMdevices.net (1, 2, 3, 4) that Google TV on ARM would be a certainty, it&#8217;s also be talked about by ARM President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been rumoring this for many months here on ARMdevices.net (1, 2, 3, 4) that Google TV on ARM would be a certainty, it&#8217;s also be talked about by ARM President [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARM Powered&#8230; Google TV? &#8211; ARMdevices.net</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-7056</link>
		<dc:creator>ARM Powered&#8230; Google TV? &#8211; ARMdevices.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-7056</guid>
		<description>[...] profile high bitrate support (possibly, Intel muscling for some HW decoder exclusivity?). What I am wondering, is, how soon will the Google TV OS be announced to run on the next generation ARM Cortex A9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] profile high bitrate support (possibly, Intel muscling for some HW decoder exclusivity?). What I am wondering, is, how soon will the Google TV OS be announced to run on the next generation ARM Cortex A9 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARM Powered Google TV coming &#8211; ARMdevices.net</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-6875</link>
		<dc:creator>ARM Powered Google TV coming &#8211; ARMdevices.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-6875</guid>
		<description>[...] already knew it (2, 3, 4), logically, Google is working with ARM to prepare the ARM Powered Google TV boxes to come [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already knew it (2, 3, 4), logically, Google is working with ARM to prepare the ARM Powered Google TV boxes to come [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrenbzf</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrenbzf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-4038</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a relevant article from Wired:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Networks Proving A Tough Sell for Google TV (Surprise!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/networks-monkeywrench-google-tv/2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/networks...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s a relevant article from Wired:</p>
<p>Networks Proving A Tough Sell for Google TV (Surprise!)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/networks-monkeywrench-google-tv/2/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/networks" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/08/networks</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-08-20 &#124; SimplyGoogleTV</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2010-08-20 &#124; SimplyGoogleTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>[...] Easy to see why Google is moving into video in whatever ways it can.(tags: Advertising)ARM Powered Google TV, how soon?&quot;Google needs to announce the ARM Powered Google TV to compete with the rumored Apple iTV. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Easy to see why Google is moving into video in whatever ways it can.(tags: Advertising)ARM Powered Google TV, how soon?&quot;Google needs to announce the ARM Powered Google TV to compete with the rumored Apple iTV. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Google TV be powered by ARM? &#124; GTVHub.com</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Google TV be powered by ARM? &#124; GTVHub.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>[...] ARMdevices &#124; via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ARMdevices | via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://armdevices.net/2010/08/20/arm-powered-google-tv-how-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armdevices.net/?p=2025#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering why Google didn&#039;t choose ARM in the first place.  My best guess is that Google&#039;s upcoming WebM / VP8 format has hardware acceleration support promised by numerous big names but is currently nonexistent.  In order for GoogleTV to be ready for 1080p WebM content, they were forced to pick Intel Atom chips and do the decoding in software until hardware acceleration becomes available.  The problem is that Atom-powered netbooks have had a hard time decoding 1080p h.264 video so why would WebM be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been wondering why Google didn&#39;t choose ARM in the first place.  My best guess is that Google&#39;s upcoming WebM / VP8 format has hardware acceleration support promised by numerous big names but is currently nonexistent.  In order for GoogleTV to be ready for 1080p WebM content, they were forced to pick Intel Atom chips and do the decoding in software until hardware acceleration becomes available.  The problem is that Atom-powered netbooks have had a hard time decoding 1080p h.264 video so why would WebM be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

